
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs Quadro FX 380M

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 380M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is positioned at rank 611 and the Quadro FX 380M is on rank 161, so the Quadro FX 380M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 380M.
| Insight | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and Quadro FX 380M

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.

Quadro FX 380M
The Quadro FX 380M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 scores 125 and the Quadro FX 380M reaches 121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 380M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380M). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380M).
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 125+3% | 121 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+41% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (Quadro FX 380M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1 | 11.1 (FL10_1)+11% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs VP4 (Quadro FX 380M). Decoder: UVD vs VP4.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD | VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 380M's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2+600% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Codename | M98 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2009 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #927 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















