
T1000 8GB vs GeForce GTX 1060

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T1000 8GB is positioned at rank #94 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 8GB uses modern memory architecture. The T1000 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 31.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000 8GB.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-31.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+31.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $380 for the T1000 8GB, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 730.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+730.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1000 8GB and GeForce GTX 1060

T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the T1000 8GB scores 7,674 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 31.1%. The T1000 8GB is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (T1000 8GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,674 | 10,064+31% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+255% |
| Boost Clock | 1395 MHz | 1733 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 160+186% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 960 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T1000 8GB comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T1000 8GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000 8GB) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The T1000 8GB draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 113% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000 8GB) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 156mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-72% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 156mm | 173mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.5+175% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The T1000 8GB launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 84.2% less ($320 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T1000 8GB) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 730.2% better value. The T1000 8GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $249-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $60-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 167.7+730% |
| Codename | TU117 | GP104 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #332 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















