T1000 8GB vs GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T1000 8GB is positioned at rank 94 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is on rank 9, so the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 8GB uses modern memory architecture. The T1000 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000 8GB.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $380 for the T1000 8GB, it costs 74% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 288.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+288.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1000 8GB and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The T1000 8GB scores 7,674 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design reaches 7,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1000 8GB is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (T1000 8GB) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,674 | 7,853+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+52% |
| Boost Clock | 1395 MHz | 1480 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+87% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T1000 8GB comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T1000 8GB) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000 8GB) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The T1000 8GB draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000 8GB) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-38% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.5+56% | 98.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design costs 73.7% less ($280 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T1000 8GB) vs 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 288.6% better value. The T1000 8GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $100-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 78.5+289% |
| Codename | TU117 | GP106 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #332 | #401 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T1000 8GB and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
