
T1000 8GB vs T1000

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T1000 8GB is positioned at rank 94 and the T1000 is on rank 73, so the T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Per Dollar T1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T1000 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The T1000 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $382 for the T1000, it costs 1% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 0.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($380) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($382) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1000 8GB and T1000

T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.

T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The T1000 8GB scores 7,674 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1000 8GB is built on Turing while the T1000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (T1000 8GB) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,674 | 7,649 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 TFLOPS | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1395 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000 8GB) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The T1000 8GB draws 50W versus the T1000's 50W — a 0% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000 8GB) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 156mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.5 | 153.0 |
Value Analysis
The T1000 8GB launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the T1000 launched at $350 and now averages $382. The T1000 8GB costs 0.5% less ($2 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T1000 8GB) vs 20.0 (T1000) — the T1000 8GB offers 1% better value.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $350-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $382 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 20.0 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #332 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















