GeForce RTX 3070 vs T1000
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar T1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 189.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+189.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-189.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $382 for the T1000, it costs 48% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 453.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+453.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($382) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and T1000
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the T1000's 7,649 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 189.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+190% | 7,649 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+557% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+712% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+24% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+229% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+559% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the T1000's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 156mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 153.0+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the T1000 launched at $350 and now averages $382. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 47.6% less ($182 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 20.0 (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 454.5% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $350-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-48% | $382 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+455% | 20.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and T1000
