
T1000 8GB vs GRID P40-8Q

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:

GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T1000 8GB is positioned at rank 94 and the GRID P40-8Q is on rank 265, so the T1000 8GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 8GB is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The T1000 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T1000 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-8Q.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $380 for the T1000 8GB, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 147.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1000 8GB and GRID P40-8Q

T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.

GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.
Graphics Performance
The T1000 8GB scores 7,674 and the GRID P40-8Q reaches 7,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1000 8GB is built on Turing while the GRID P40-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (T1000 8GB) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,674+2% | 7,507 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+93% |
| Boost Clock | 1395 MHz+18% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T1000 8GB) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000 8GB) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The T1000 8GB draws 50W versus the GRID P40-8Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000 8GB) vs 350W (GRID P40-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.5+360% | 33.4 |
Value Analysis
The T1000 8GB launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GRID P40-8Q costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.2 (T1000 8GB) vs 50.0 (GRID P40-8Q) — the GRID P40-8Q offers 147.5% better value. The T1000 8GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | T1000 8GB | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-83% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $150-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 50.0+148% |
| Codename | TU117 | GM204 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #332 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











