T1000
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

T1000

2021Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1395 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T1000 is positioned at rank #73 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T1000

#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
98%
#38
Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP: $699|Avg: $699
86%
#41
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
83%
#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
82%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
81%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
80%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
77%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
76%
#58
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
676%
#73
T1000
MSRP: $350|Avg: $382
100%
#74
Quadro P620
MSRP: $170|Avg: $48
100%
#78
Radeon Pro 570
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
97%
#80
T400
MSRP: $180|Avg: $179
92%
#86
Quadro P3200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $63
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000.

InsightT1000GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $382 for the T1000, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 424% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightT1000GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+424%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($382)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T1000 and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

T1000

The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The T1000 scores 7,649 and the GeForce GTX 1650 reaches 7,869 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1000 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (T1000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
7,649
7,869+3%
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
896
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.5 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1665 MHz+19%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
896 KB
896 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.1
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC 7.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP9
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T1000 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 156mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
156mm
229mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
153.0+46%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The T1000 launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $382, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 80.4% less ($307 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.0 (T1000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 424.5% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureT1000GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$350
$149-57%
Avg Price (30d)
$382
$75-80%
Performance per Dollar
20.0
104.9+425%
Codename
TU117
TU117
Release
May 6 2021
April 23 2019
Ranking
#333
#323