Tesla M2070-Q vs GeForce GTX 560M
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2070-Q is positioned at rank 398 and the GeForce GTX 560M is on rank 165, so the GeForce GTX 560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M2070-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 560M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tesla M2070-Q | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+500%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M2070-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2070-Q and GeForce GTX 560M
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
GeForce GTX 560M
The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M2070-Q scores 1,306 and the GeForce GTX 560M reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2070-Q is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 560M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 560M). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,306+2% | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 448+133% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS+73% | 0.5952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+250% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M2070-Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 560M offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560M) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 3 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M2070-Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 560M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 560M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 17.1+195% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M2070-Q and GeForce GTX 560M
