Tesla M2070-Q vs Quadro 4000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2070-Q is positioned at rank 398 and the Quadro 4000M is on rank 91, so the Quadro 4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q

#381

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

61554%

#396

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

100%

#397

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

100%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

100%

#399

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

96%

#400

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

96%

#401

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

92%

#402

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

83%

#404

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

83%

#405

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

75%

#407

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

71%

#408

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

67%

#409

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

67%

#411

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000M

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

95%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

93%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

92%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

90%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

89%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

87%

#76

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

918%

#91

Quadro 4000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

95%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

92%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

91%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla M2070-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 4000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Tesla M2070-Q	Quadro 4000M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M2070-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla M2070-Q Benchmark Check

Quadro 4000M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2070-Q and Quadro 4000M

Tesla M2070-Q

The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla M2070-Q scores 1,306 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2070-Q is built on Fermi while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).

Feature	Tesla M2070-Q	Quadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score	1,306+1%	1,287
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	448+33%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS+61%	0.6384 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	896 KB+100%	448 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla M2070-Q	Quadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla M2070-Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla M2070-Q	Quadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla M2070-Q draws 225W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro 4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.