Tesla M2070-Q vs Tesla M2070
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2070-Q is positioned at rank 398 and the Tesla M2070 is on rank 387, so the Tesla M2070 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M2070-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070.
| Insight | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M2070-Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M2070-Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2070-Q and Tesla M2070
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Tesla M2070
The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M2070-Q scores 1,306 and the Tesla M2070 reaches 1,305 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2070-Q is built on Fermi while the Tesla M2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 448 (Tesla M2070). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070).
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,306 | 1,305 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.03 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M2070-Q draws 225W versus the Tesla M2070's 225W — a 0% difference. The Tesla M2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 350W (Tesla M2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Tesla M2070 launched at $3099 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070) — the Tesla M2070 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | Tesla M2070-Q | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5489 | $3099-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 26.1 |
| Codename | GF100 | GF100 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #798 | #698 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M2070-Q and Tesla M2070
