
Tesla M6 vs GeForce MX570 A

Tesla M6
Popular choices:

GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M6 is positioned at rank 188 and the GeForce MX570 A is on rank 239, so the Tesla M6 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M6
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX570 A is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce MX570 A likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M6 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M6 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M6 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $84 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 72% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 258.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+258.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($84) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M6 and GeForce MX570 A

Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M6 scores 6,225 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M6 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Tesla M6) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A). Boost clocks: 1180 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,225 | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.625 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz+2% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 2 MB+257% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M6 draws 100W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M6) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 25W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 62.3 | 248.3+299% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M6 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $84, while the GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Tesla M6 costs 72% less ($216 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.1 (Tesla M6) vs 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) — the Tesla M6 offers 258% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Tesla M6 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $300-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $84-72% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.1+258% | 20.7 |
| Codename | GM204 | GA107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #388 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












