
Tesla M6 vs Quadro P3000

Tesla M6
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M6 is positioned at rank 188 and the Quadro P3000 is on rank 135, so the Quadro P3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M6
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M6.
| Insight | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $84), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 7.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($84) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M6 and Quadro P3000

Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M6 scores 6,225 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M6 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Tesla M6) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 1180 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,225 | 6,384+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.625 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+248% |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | 1645 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 96 | 240+150% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 1.4 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M6 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla M6) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Tesla M6) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M6 draws 100W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M6) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.3+144% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M6 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $84, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Quadro P3000 costs 4.8% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.1 (Tesla M6) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 7.7% better value. The Quadro P3000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Tesla M6 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $600-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $84 | $80-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.1 | 79.8+8% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP102 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #388 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












