
Tesla P4 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Tesla P4
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla P4 is positioned at rank #154 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla P4
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla P4 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla P4 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla P4 holds the technical lead. Priced at $190 (vs $400), it costs 53% less, resulting in a 115.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+115.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($190) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla P4 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla P4 scores 9,004 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla P4 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Tesla P4) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,004+2% | 8,811 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5760 ×2+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.704 TFLOPS+13% | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz+27% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240 ×2+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+300% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla P4 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla P4) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit x2+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla P4) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla P4 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla P4) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-80% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 267mm |
| Height | 53mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 120.1+411% | 23.5 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla P4 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 and now averages $400. The Tesla P4 costs 52.5% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.4 (Tesla P4) vs 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the Tesla P4 offers 115.5% better value. The Tesla P4 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Tesla P4 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-67% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $190-53% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.4+115% | 22.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK110B |
| Release | September 13 2016 | May 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #293 | #300 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















