Tesla P4
VS
Radeon R9 390

Tesla P4 vs Radeon R9 390

NVIDIA

Tesla P4

2016Core: 886 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla P4 is positioned at rank #154 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla P4

#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
96%
#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
84%
#139
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1641%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
100%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
98%
#158
Quadro M2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $70
95%
#159
Quadro M4000
MSRP: $791|Avg: $350
94%
#160
FirePro W4100
MSRP: $183|Avg: $183
91%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
83%
#167
Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP: $400|Avg: $120
80%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
80%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla P4 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 390 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightTesla P4Radeon R9 390
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (275mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 390 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 390 holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $190), it costs 66% less, resulting in a 187.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla P4Radeon R9 390
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+187.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($190)
More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla P4 and Radeon R9 390

NVIDIA

Tesla P4

The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 390

The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla P4 scores 9,004 and the Radeon R9 390 reaches 8,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla P4 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Tesla P4) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 390). Raw compute: 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
G3D Mark Score
9,004+2%
8,855
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.704 TFLOPS+11%
5.12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1114 MHz+11%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
160
L1 Cache
960 KB+50%
640 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla P4 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390 has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 390 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla P4) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit
512-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla P4) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 390). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390).

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla P4 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 390's 300W — a 120% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla P4) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 275mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
TDP
75W-75%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W-33%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
168mm
275mm
Height
53mm
109mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-21%
95°C
Perf/Watt
120.1+307%
29.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla P4 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $190, while the Radeon R9 390 launched at $329 and now averages $65. The Radeon R9 390 costs 65.8% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.4 (Tesla P4) vs 136.2 (Radeon R9 390) — the Radeon R9 390 offers 187.3% better value. The Tesla P4 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureTesla P4Radeon R9 390
MSRP
$1000
$329-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$190
$65-66%
Performance per Dollar
47.4
136.2+187%
Codename
GP104
Grenada
Release
September 13 2016
June 18 2015
Ranking
#293
#296