Tesla T10 vs GRID RTX6000-1Q
Tesla T10
Popular choices:
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The GRID RTX6000-1Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla T10.
| Insight | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla T10 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $975 versus $1,500 for the GRID RTX6000-1Q, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 53.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($975) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla T10 and GRID RTX6000-1Q
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla T10 scores 12,558 and the GRID RTX6000-1Q reaches 12,617 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla T10 is built on Turing while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Tesla T10) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,558 | 12,617 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.38 TFLOPS+198% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz+32% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+125% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Tesla T10) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla T10 draws 260W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 14.4% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla T10) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 225W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 48.3 | 56.1+16% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla T10 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $975, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 and now averages $1500. The Tesla T10 costs 35% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.9 (Tesla T10) vs 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the Tesla T10 offers 53.6% better value.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-68% | $6299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $975-35% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9+54% | 8.4 |
| Codename | TU102 | GM204 |
| Release | sem dados | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #213 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla T10 and GRID RTX6000-1Q
