Tesla T10 vs Quadro P5000
Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P5000 is significantly newer (2016 vs 0). The Quadro P5000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla T10.
| Insight | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $400 versus $975 for the Tesla T10, it costs 59% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 147% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($975) | ✅More affordable ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla T10 and Quadro P5000
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla T10 scores 12,558 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla T10 is built on Turing while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Tesla T10) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,558 | 12,728+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.38 TFLOPS+62% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1733 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla T10 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Tesla T10) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1+10% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla T10 draws 260W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 36.4% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla T10) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 180W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 48.3 | 70.7+46% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla T10 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $975, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $400. The Quadro P5000 costs 59% less ($575 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.9 (Tesla T10) vs 31.8 (Quadro P5000) — the Quadro P5000 offers 146.5% better value.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-20% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $975 | $400-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 31.8+147% |
| Codename | TU102 | GP104 |
| Release | sem dados | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #213 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla T10 and Quadro P5000
