
TITAN RTX vs GeForce GTX 1060

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The TITAN RTX uses modern memory architecture. The TITAN RTX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN RTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 99.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (24 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+99.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-99.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $1,203.96 for the TITAN RTX, it costs 95% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 904.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+904.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,203.96) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN RTX and GeForce GTX 1060

TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the TITAN RTX scores 20,095 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the TITAN RTX leads by 99.7%. The TITAN RTX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (TITAN RTX) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,095+100% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+84% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+2% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+379% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN RTX comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 250% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (TITAN RTX) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+250% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN RTX draws 280W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 43.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (TITAN RTX) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 280W | 180W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 116mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.8+28% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The TITAN RTX launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $1203.96, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95% less ($1144 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.7 (TITAN RTX) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 904.2% better value. The TITAN RTX is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $249-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1203.96 | $60-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.7 | 167.7+904% |
| Codename | TU102 | GP104 |
| Release | December 18 2018 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #91 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















