
TITAN RTX vs RTX A4500

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:

RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the TITAN RTX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A4500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $1,203.96 for the TITAN RTX, it costs 34% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 58% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,203.96) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN RTX and RTX A4500

TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the TITAN RTX scores 20,095 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 5%. The TITAN RTX is built on Turing while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (TITAN RTX) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (TITAN RTX) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 576 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,095 | 21,094+5% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 7168+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+7% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+29% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 7 MB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+29% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 576+157% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN RTX comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 50% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+1100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+50% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN RTX draws 280W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (TITAN RTX) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 280W | 200W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.8 | 105.5+47% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN RTX launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $1203.96, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699 and now averages $800. The RTX A4500 costs 33.6% less ($404 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.7 (TITAN RTX) vs 26.4 (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 offers 58.1% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1699-32% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1203.96 | $800-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.7 | 26.4+58% |
| Codename | TU102 | GA102 |
| Release | December 18 2018 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #91 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















