TITAN RTX vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the TITAN RTX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN RTX and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN RTX scores 20,095 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 20,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN RTX is built on Turing while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (TITAN RTX) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (TITAN RTX) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 576 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,095 | 20,312+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 12800+178% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2550 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 288 | 400+39% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 12.5 MB+178% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 72 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | 100+39% |
| Tensor Cores | 576+44% | 400 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN RTX comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 16 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 16.7% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (TITAN RTX) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+17% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 72 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN RTX draws 280W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 46.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (TITAN RTX) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 280W | 175W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.8 | 116.1+62% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1203.96 | — |
| Codename | TU102 | AD102 |
| Release | December 18 2018 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #91 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN RTX and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
