GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 9.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+9% | 20,312 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 12800+117% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+221% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2550 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 184 | 400+117% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 12.5 MB+116% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 100+117% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 400+117% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 16 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 28.6% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 22.8% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 175W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 116.1+15% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
