TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

TITAN V CEO Edition vs GeForce GTX 1650

TITAN V CEO Edition

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The TITAN V CEO Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 115.9% higher G3D Mark score and 681.3% more VRAM (31 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+115.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-115.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Volta (2017−2020))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+681.3%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $5,300 for the TITAN V CEO Edition, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 3173.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3173.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,300)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V CEO Edition and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

TITAN V CEO Edition

The TITAN V CEO Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 21 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,988 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the TITAN V CEO Edition scores 16,988 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the TITAN V CEO Edition leads by 115.9%. The TITAN V CEO Edition is built on Volta while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
16,988+116%
7,869
Architecture
Volta
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
5120+471%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
14.9 TFLOPS+399%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1665 MHz+14%
ROPs
128+300%
32
TMUs
320+471%
56
L1 Cache
10 MB+1036%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+500%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The TITAN V CEO Edition comes with 31 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The TITAN V CEO Edition offers 681.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 868 GB/s (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 578.1% advantage for the TITAN V CEO Edition. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the TITAN V CEO Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
31.25 GB+681%
4 GB
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
868 GB/s+578%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
4096-bit+3100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+500%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.0
12
Vulkan
1.1
1.4+27%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 6.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCN 6.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP9
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The TITAN V CEO Edition draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
250W
75W-70%
Recommended PSU
600W
300W-50%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
None
Length
267mm
229mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
68.0
104.9+54%
💰

Value Analysis

The TITAN V CEO Edition launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $5300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.6% less ($5225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3178.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureTITAN V CEO EditionGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$5300
$75-99%
Performance per Dollar
3.2
104.9+3178%
Codename
GV100
TU117
Release
June 21 2018
April 23 2019
Ranking
#115
#323