
TITAN V CEO Edition vs GeForce GTX 1650

TITAN V CEO Edition
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN V CEO Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 115.9% higher G3D Mark score and 681.3% more VRAM (31 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+115.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-115.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Volta (2017−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+681.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $5,300 for the TITAN V CEO Edition, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 3173.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3173.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,300) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN V CEO Edition and GeForce GTX 1650

TITAN V CEO Edition
The TITAN V CEO Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 21 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,988 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the TITAN V CEO Edition scores 16,988 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the TITAN V CEO Edition leads by 115.9%. The TITAN V CEO Edition is built on Volta while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,988+116% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Volta | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+471% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.9 TFLOPS+399% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1665 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 320+471% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+1036% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN V CEO Edition comes with 31 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The TITAN V CEO Edition offers 681.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 868 GB/s (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 578.1% advantage for the TITAN V CEO Edition. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the TITAN V CEO Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 31.25 GB+681% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 868 GB/s+578% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 6.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 6.0 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN V CEO Edition draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 300W-50% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 68.0 | 104.9+54% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN V CEO Edition launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $5300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.6% less ($5225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (TITAN V CEO Edition) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3178.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | TITAN V CEO Edition | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5300 | $75-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 104.9+3178% |
| Codename | GV100 | TU117 |
| Release | June 21 2018 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #115 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















