Turion 64 MT-40 vs Xeon 3.20
Turion 64 MT-40
Xeon 3.20
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 MT-40 is positioned at rank 880 and the Xeon 3.20 is on rank 1030, so the Turion 64 MT-40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-40
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.20
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 MT-40 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 MT-40 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 MT-40 and Xeon 3.20
Turion 64 MT-40
The Turion 64 MT-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon 3.20
The Xeon 3.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Turion 64 MT-40 and Xeon 3.20 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-40 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 3.20 — a 37% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.20. The Turion 64 MT-40 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Xeon 3.20 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 MT-40 scores 600 against the Xeon 3.20's 575 — a 4.3% lead for the Turion 64 MT-40. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion 64 MT-40 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.20.
| Feature | Turion 64 MT-40 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 90 nm-31% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Gallatin (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 600+4% | 575 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 MT-40 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 3.20 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion 64 MT-40 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 MT-40 and Xeon 3.20
