Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 MT-40

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Turion 64 MT-40

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2005
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 MT-40 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
1 / 1
622
+3.7%
brand logoAthlon XP 2600+
brand logoAthlon XP 3000+
brand logoAthlon 64 3100+
brand logoAthlon 64 3400+
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 6860Z
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Turion 64 MT-40
1 / 1
600
0.0%
brand logoAthlon 64 2000+
brand logoAthlon 64 2600+
brand logoAthlon 64 3000+
brand logoAthlon 64 3300+
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 6860Z
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 MT-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 MT-40
low15 FPS
medium15 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 MT-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

2005

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion 64 MT-40

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (600 vs 622).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ better than Turion 64 MT-40?
    Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 MT-40 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Turion 64 MT-40

    The Turion 64 MT-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Turion 64 MT-40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-40 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Turion 64 MT-40 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Turion 64 MT-40's 600 — a 3.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Turion 64 MT-40
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz+9%
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    1 MB
    Process
    —
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Clawhammer (2001−2005)
    Lancaster (2005−2006)
    PassMark
    622+4%
    600
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Turion 64 MT-40
    Socket
    754
    754
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) / not specified (Turion 64 MT-40). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Turion 64 MT-40
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —