E1-1500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

E1-1500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ Performance Spectrum

E1-1500

2 / 2

660

+6.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 / 1

622

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-1500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-1500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-1500

2013

Why buy it

✅+6.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (622 vs 660).

Quick Answers

So, is E1-1500 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3700+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E1-1500 pulls ahead with 6.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-1500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-1500 is the better buy right now. E1-1500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 6.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-1500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E1-1500 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E1-1500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1-1500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The E1-1500 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the E1-1500 scores 660 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+'s 622 — a 5.9% lead for the E1-1500.

Feature	E1-1500	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.48 GHz	2.4 GHz+62%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	40 nm	—
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark	660+6%	622

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-1500 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.