E1-1500 vs Pentium SU4100

E1-1500 vs Pentium SU4100 Performance Spectrum

E1-1500

2 / 2

660

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU4100

2 / 2

685

+3.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-1500 vs Pentium SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-1500 vs Pentium SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-1500

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 364.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium SU4100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (660 vs 685).
❌80% higher power demand at 18W vs 10W.

Pentium SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 18W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium SU4100 better than E1-1500?

Yes. Pentium SU4100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium SU4100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium SU4100 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium SU4100 comes in 381.7% more expensive on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. E1-1500 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-1500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E1-1500 vs Pentium SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-1500 and Pentium SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 12.9% clock advantage for the E1-1500. The E1-1500 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E1-1500 scores 660 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 3.7% lead for the Pentium SU4100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E1-1500	Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.48 GHz+14%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	660	685+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-1500 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E1-1500	Pentium SU4100
Socket	FT1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the E1-1500 was priced at $60, while the Pentium SU4100 came in at $289. On launch pricing ($60 vs $289), E1-1500 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E1-1500 delivers 11.0 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the E1-1500 the 129.1% better value option.

Feature	E1-1500	Pentium SU4100
MSRP	$60-79%	$289
Performance per Dollar	11.0+358%	2.4
Release Date	2013	2009

Search E1-1500 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.