E1-1500
VS
Pentium SU4100

E1-1500 vs Pentium SU4100

AMD

E1-1500

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.48 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-1500 is positioned at rank 979 and the Pentium SU4100 is on rank 1235, so the E1-1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-1500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
28338%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
26776%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19442%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5857%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2325%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2294%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2089%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2089%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2065%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2010%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1982%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1974%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1956%
#979
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#980
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
100%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
100%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
99%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
99%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
98%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
97%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
96%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
96%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
95%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
95%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
93%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
93%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium SU4100

#1223
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
12380%
#1224
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
12198%
#1225
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
11198%
#1226
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
11148%
#1227
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
11046%
#1229
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
10667%
#1230
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
10228%
#1231
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
10211%
#1232
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
9937%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
100%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
90%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
87%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
86%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
78%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E1-1500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium SU4100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE1-1500Pentium SU4100
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the E1-1500 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 33% cheaper ($10 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightE1-1500Pentium SU4100
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+45%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-1500 and Pentium SU4100

AMD

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the E1-1500 and Pentium SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 12.9% clock advantage for the E1-1500. The E1-1500 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E1-1500 scores 660 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 3.7% lead for the Pentium SU4100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE1-1500Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.48 GHz+14%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
40 nm-11%
45 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
660
685+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-1500 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-1500Pentium SU4100
Socket
FT1
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The E1-1500 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Pentium SU4100 debuted at $289. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the E1-1500 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E1-1500 delivers 66.0 pts/$ vs 45.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the E1-1500 the 36.4% better value option.

FeatureE1-1500Pentium SU4100
MSRP
$60-79%
$289
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
66.0+44%
45.7
Release Date
2013
2009