Celeron E1200 vs E1-1500

Celeron E1200 vs E1-1500 Performance Spectrum

Celeron E1200

2 / 2

665

+0.8%

660

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1200 vs E1-1500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1200 vs E1-1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1200

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.

E1-1500

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron E1200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (660 vs 665).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E1200 better than E1-1500?

Yes. Celeron E1200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E1200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E1200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E1200 comes in $7 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.1% better value on MSRP (12.5 vs 11.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-1500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron E1200 vs E1-1500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1200

The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E1200 and E1-1500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 versus 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Celeron E1200. The Celeron E1200 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the E1-1500 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1200 scores 665 against the E1-1500's 660 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron E1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E1200	E1-1500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+8%	1.48 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	40 nm-38%
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	665	660
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E1200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-1500 uses FT1 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron E1200	E1-1500
Socket	LGA775	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron E1200) / not specified (E1-1500). Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140.

Feature	Celeron E1200	E1-1500
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1200 was priced at $53, while the E1-1500 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($53 vs $60), Celeron E1200 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1200 delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the E1-1500 — making the Celeron E1200 the 13.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1200	E1-1500
MSRP	$53-12%	$60
Performance per Dollar	12.5+14%	11.0
Release Date	2008	2013

Search Celeron E1200 on Amazon

Search E1-1500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.