Celeron E1200 vs Celeron N3000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1200 vs Celeron N3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1200 vs Celeron N3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1200

2008

Why buy it

✅+31% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N3000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Celeron N3000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N3000

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Celeron E1200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (290 vs 380).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3000 better than Celeron E1200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N3000 is ahead with a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1200 pulls ahead with 31% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 31% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N3000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E1200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron E1200 vs Celeron N3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1200

The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.

Celeron N3000

The Celeron N3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E1200 and Celeron N3000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 versus 2.08 GHz on the Celeron N3000 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3000 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.04 GHz). The Celeron E1200 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N3000 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1200 scores 665 against the Celeron N3000's 705 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron N3000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 160, a 27% lead for the Celeron E1200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 380 vs 290 (26.9% advantage for the Celeron E1200). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Celeron N3000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.08 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+54%	1.04 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	665	705+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	210+31%	160
Geekbench 6 Multi	380+31%	290

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E1200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N3000 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1200 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron N3000 — the Celeron N3000 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E1200) vs 4 (Celeron N3000) — the Celeron N3000 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1200) and SoC (Celeron N3000).

Feature	Celeron E1200	Celeron N3000
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3L-1600+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron E1200) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron N3000). The Celeron N3000 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Celeron E1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget, Celeron N3000 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140; Celeron N3000 rivals AMD E2-7110.