Celeron E1200 vs Pentium SU4100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1200 vs Pentium SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1200 vs Pentium SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1200

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $236 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 429.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 685).
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Pentium SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅+3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium SU4100 better than Celeron E1200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron E1200 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium SU4100 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium SU4100 comes in 445.3% more expensive on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you 3% better PassMark. Celeron E1200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 429.4% better value on paper (12.5 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium SU4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E1200 vs Pentium SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1200

The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E1200 and Pentium SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Celeron E1200 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron E1200 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1200 scores 665 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 3% lead for the Pentium SU4100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	2 MB+300%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	665	685+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E1200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium SU4100
Socket	LGA775	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron E1200) / not specified (Pentium SU4100). Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium SU4100
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1200 was priced at $53, while the Pentium SU4100 came in at $289. On launch pricing ($53 vs $289), Celeron E1200 was $236 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1200 delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the Celeron E1200 the 136.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium SU4100
MSRP	$53-82%	$289
Performance per Dollar	12.5+421%	2.4
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron E1200 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.