Celeron B720 vs E1-1500

Celeron B720 vs E1-1500 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B720

1 / 1

665

+0.8%

660

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B720 vs E1-1500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B720 vs E1-1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B720

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while E1-1500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

E1-1500

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B720 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (660 vs 665).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B720 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B720 better than E1-1500?

Yes. Celeron B720 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B720 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B720 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B720 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron B720 comes in 16.7% more expensive on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. E1-1500 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-1500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B720 vs E1-1500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B720

The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B720 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E1-1500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E1-1500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 versus 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 — a 13.8% clock advantage for the Celeron B720. The Celeron B720 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E1-1500 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B720 scores 665 against the E1-1500's 660 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron B720. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720 vs 0 kB on the E1-1500.

Feature	Celeron B720	E1-1500
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz+15%	1.48 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm-20%	40 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	665	660

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B720 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E1-1500 uses FT1 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B720	E1-1500
Socket	G2	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B720) / not specified (E1-1500). The Celeron B720 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E1-1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B720	E1-1500
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B720 was priced at $70, while the E1-1500 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($70 vs $60), E1-1500 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B720 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the E1-1500 — making the E1-1500 the 14.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B720	E1-1500
MSRP	$70	$60-14%
Performance per Dollar	9.5	11.0+16%
Release Date	2012	2013

Search Celeron B720 on Amazon

Search E1-1500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.