Celeron B720 vs Turion 64 ML-44

Celeron B720 vs Turion 64 ML-44 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B720

1 / 1

665

+3.1%

645

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B720 vs Turion 64 ML-44 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B720 vs Turion 64 ML-44: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B720

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Turion 64 ML-44 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-44 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-44

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B720 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (645 vs 665).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B720 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B720 better than Turion 64 ML-44?

Yes. Celeron B720 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B720 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B720 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B720 is the better buy right now. Celeron B720 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $70 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B720 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B720 vs Turion 64 ML-44 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B720

The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

Turion 64 ML-44

The Turion 64 ML-44 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B720 and Turion 64 ML-44 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-44 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-44. The Celeron B720 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B720 scores 665 against the Turion 64 ML-44's 645 — a 3.1% lead for the Celeron B720. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-44.

Feature	Celeron B720	Turion 64 ML-44
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.4 GHz+41%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	665+3%	645

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B720 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B720	Turion 64 ML-44
Socket	G2	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B720) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-44). The Celeron B720 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Turion 64 ML-44 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.