Celeron B720 vs Pentium SU4100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B720 vs Pentium SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B720 vs Pentium SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B720

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 300.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium SU4100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 685).

Pentium SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅+3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B720 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B720 better than Pentium SU4100?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron B720 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B720 is the better buy right now. Celeron B720 comes in $219 cheaper on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium SU4100 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3% better PassMark. It is also 300.8% better value on MSRP (9.5 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B720 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B720 vs Pentium SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B720

The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B720 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium SU4100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium SU4100 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Celeron B720 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron B720 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B720 scores 665 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 3% lead for the Pentium SU4100. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720 vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU4100.

Feature	Celeron B720	Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz+31%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+31%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	665	685+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B720 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B720	Pentium SU4100
Socket	G2	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B720) / not specified (Pentium SU4100). The Celeron B720 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B720	Pentium SU4100
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B720 was priced at $70, while the Pentium SU4100 came in at $289. On launch pricing ($70 vs $289), Celeron B720 was $219 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B720 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the Celeron B720 the 120.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B720	Pentium SU4100
MSRP	$70-76%	$289
Performance per Dollar	9.5+296%	2.4
Release Date	2012	2009

Search Celeron B720 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.