Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 / 1

622

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium D 830

2 / 2

618

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 130W, a 129W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium D 830.

Pentium D 830

2005

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (618 vs 622).
❌Launch MSRP is still $316 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌12900% higher power demand at 130W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ better than Pentium D 830?

Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $316 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium D 830 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2005 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium D 830 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium D 830

The Pentium D 830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 618 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium D 830 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium D 830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 3 GHz on the Pentium D 830 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium D 830. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Pentium D 830 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Pentium D 830's 618 — a 0.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+	Pentium D 830
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	—	90 nm
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	622	618
Geekbench 6 Single	—	151
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	341

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium D 830 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 830 — the Pentium D 830 supports 66.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium D 830 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 2 (Pentium D 830). PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 16 (Pentium D 830) — the Pentium D 830 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) and 945,955,975 (Pentium D 830).

Feature	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+	Pentium D 830
Socket	754	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	400	DDR2-667+67%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs None (Pentium D 830). Primary use case: Pentium D 830 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.