Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Pentium D 830
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is positioned at rank 321 and the Pentium D 830 is on rank 1103, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 830
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Pentium D 830
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.
Pentium D 830
The Pentium D 830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 618 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium D 830 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium D 830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 3 GHz on the Pentium D 830 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium D 830. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Pentium D 830 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Pentium D 830's 618 — a 0.6% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | — | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | — | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 622 | 618 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 151 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 341 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium D 830 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 830 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium D 830 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 2 (Pentium D 830). PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs 16 (Pentium D 830) — the Pentium D 830 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) and 945,955,975 (Pentium D 830).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) vs None (Pentium D 830). Primary use case: Pentium D 830 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Pentium D 830
