Athlon 64 3800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3800+

1 / 1

648

+4.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 / 1

622

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3800+

2004

Why buy it

✅+4.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $354 MSRP, while Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (622 vs 648).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3800+ better than Mobile Athlon 64 3700+?

Yes. Athlon 64 3800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 4.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 3800+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $354 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.2% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3800+

The Athlon 64 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 648 points. Launch price was $160.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3800+ and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the Venice (2004−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3800+ scores 648 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+'s 622 — a 4.1% lead for the Athlon 64 3800+.

Feature	Athlon 64 3800+	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	—
Architecture	Venice (2004−2005)	Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark	648+4%	622

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — the Athlon 64 3800+ supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3800+) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 3800+) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+).

Feature	Athlon 64 3800+	Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Socket	939	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+100%	400
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3800+) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.