
Athlon 64 3800+

Pentium T2330
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2330 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2330 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3800+
2004Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T2330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (648 vs 665).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 4.4 PassMark/$ ($354 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌154.3% higher power demand at 89W vs 35W.
Pentium T2330
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $354 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $354 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 89W, a 54W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium T2330 better than Athlon 64 3800+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2330 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3800+
The Athlon 64 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 648 points. Launch price was $160.

Pentium T2330
The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 3800+ is built on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3800+ scores 648 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 2.6% lead for the Pentium T2330. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3800+ vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Venice (2004−2005) | — |
| PassMark | 648 | 665+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 223 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 402 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Athlon 64 3800+ supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3800+) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Pentium T2330 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 3800+) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800+50% | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3800+) / No (Pentium T2330).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 3800+ was priced at $354, while the Pentium T2330 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($354 vs $150), Pentium T2330 was $204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3800+ delivers 1.8 pts/$ vs 4.4 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Pentium T2330 the 83.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $354 | $150-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.8 | 4.4+144% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















