Athlon 64 3800+ vs Celeron 1047UE
Athlon 64 3800+
Celeron 1047UE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3800+ is positioned at rank 1106 and the Celeron 1047UE is on rank 1170, so the Athlon 64 3800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3800+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 3800+ | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Venice (2004−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 3800+ | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+860%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3800+ and Celeron 1047UE
Athlon 64 3800+
The Athlon 64 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 648 points. Launch price was $160.
Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 3800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 1047UE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3800+. The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the Venice (2004−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 1047UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3800+ scores 648 against the Celeron 1047UE's 675 — a 4.1% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3800+ vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+71% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 130 nm | 22 nm-83% |
| Architecture | Venice (2004−2005) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 648 | 675+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 159 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 293 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 1047UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE — the Celeron 1047UE supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3800+) vs 16 (Celeron 1047UE) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 3800+) and BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3800+) / VT-x (Celeron 1047UE). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon 64 3800+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 3800+ launched at $354 MSRP, while the Celeron 1047UE debuted at $100. At current prices ($10 vs $100), the Athlon 64 3800+ is $90 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3800+ delivers 64.8 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 1047UE — making the Athlon 64 3800+ the 162.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3800+ | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $354 | $100-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-90% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.8+853% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3800+ and Celeron 1047UE
