Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2310

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2310 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3800+

1 / 1

648

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T2310

625

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3800+

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 4.2 PassMark/$ ($354 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌154.3% higher power demand at 89W vs 35W.

Pentium T2310

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $354 MSRP).
✅Delivers 127.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $354 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 89W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (625 vs 648).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3800+ better than Pentium T2310?

Yes. Athlon 64 3800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 3800+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon 64 3800+ comes in 136.0% more expensive on MSRP at $354 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T2310 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 127.6% better value on paper (4.2 vs 1.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium T2310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3800+ vs Pentium T2310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3800+

The Athlon 64 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 648 points. Launch price was $160.

Pentium T2310

The Pentium T2310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3800+ is built on the Venice (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3800+ scores 648 against the Pentium T2310's 625 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon 64 3800+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3800+ vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2310.

Feature	Athlon 64 3800+	Pentium T2310
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Venice (2004−2005)	—
PassMark	648+4%	625

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2310 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 3800+ versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium T2310 — the Athlon 64 3800+ supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Athlon 64 3800+	Pentium T2310
Socket	939	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+20%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3800+) / VT-x is missing (Pentium T2310). Primary use case: Pentium T2310 targets Mobile.

Feature	Athlon 64 3800+	Pentium T2310
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x is missing
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 3800+ was priced at $354, while the Pentium T2310 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($354 vs $150), Pentium T2310 was $204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3800+ delivers 1.8 pts/$ vs 4.2 pts/$ for the Pentium T2310 — making the Pentium T2310 the 77.9% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 3800+	Pentium T2310
MSRP	$354	$150-58%
Performance per Dollar	1.8	4.2+133%
Release Date	2004	2007

Search Athlon 64 3800+ on Amazon

Search Pentium T2310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.