Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2005
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-44

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44 Performance Spectrum

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
1 / 1
622
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 2600+
brand logoAthlon XP 3000+
brand logoAthlon 64 3100+
brand logoAthlon 64 3400+
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 6860Z
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Turion 64 ML-44
1 / 1
645
+3.7%
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoAthlon XP 3100+
brand logoAthlon 64 3100+
brand logoAthlon 64 3500+
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 6860Z
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
1080P
Turion 64 ML-44
low16 FPS
medium16 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (622 vs 645).

    Turion 64 ML-44

    2006

    Why buy it

    • ✅+3.7% higher PassMark.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Turion 64 ML-44 better than Mobile Athlon 64 3700+?
    Yes. Turion 64 ML-44 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-44 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Turion 64 ML-44 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 ML-44 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Turion 64 ML-44 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Turion 64 ML-44

    The Turion 64 ML-44 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Turion 64 ML-44 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-44 — identical boost frequencies. The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Turion 64 ML-44's 645 — a 3.6% lead for the Turion 64 ML-44.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Turion 64 ML-44
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz
    2.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    —
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    1 MB
    Process
    —
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Clawhammer (2001−2005)
    Lancaster (2005−2006)
    PassMark
    622
    645+4%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Turion 64 ML-44
    Socket
    754
    754
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    400
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    2
    —
    RAM Channels
    1
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-44). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.

    FeatureMobile Athlon 64 3700+Turion 64 ML-44
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    IGPU Model
    None
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    false
    —