Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Performance Spectrum

Turion 64 X2 TL-60

2 / 2

1,619

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

4 / 4

1,615

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 28W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,615 vs 1,619).
❌2700% higher power demand at 28W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-60 better than VIA Nano QuadCore L4700?

Yes. Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 X2 TL-60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60

The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad/Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $69.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 versus 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-60. The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 uses the Trinidad/Tyler (2007) architecture (90 nm), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses CNQ (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 scores 1,619 against the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700's 1,615 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-60.

Feature	Turion 64 X2 TL-60	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz+36%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (per core)
Process	90 nm	40 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinidad/Tyler (2007)	CNQ (2011)
PassMark	1,619	1,615

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.