Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-60

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2008

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • 51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60

2007

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,619 vs 1,625).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1500 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-60?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron Dual-Core T1500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-60

The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad/Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-60. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 uses Trinidad/Tyler (2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 scores 1,625 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-60's 1,619 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1500Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.87 GHz
2 GHz+7%
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
65 nm-28%
90 nm
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Trinidad/Tyler (2007)
PassMark
1,625
1,619
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-60). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1500Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget