Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌1728.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 28W.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 512W, a 484W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron Dual-Core T1500 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,615 vs 1,625).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1500 better than VIA Nano QuadCore L4700?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron Dual-Core T1500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 versus 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 — a 24% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses CNQ (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 scores 1,625 against the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700's 1,615 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1500	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz+27%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	65 nm	40 nm-38%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	CNQ (2011)
PassMark	1,625	1,615

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) / not specified (VIA Nano QuadCore L4700). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.