Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Pentium G2010

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G2010

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Pentium G2010 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Pentium G2010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Pentium G2010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,625 vs 1,641).
    • 830.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 55W.

    Pentium G2010

    2013

    Why buy it

    • Draws 55W instead of 512W, a 457W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Celeron Dual-Core T1500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium G2010 better than Celeron Dual-Core T1500?
    Yes. Pentium G2010 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium G2010 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G2010 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium G2010 is the better buy right now. Pentium G2010 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $64 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium G2010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Pentium G2010 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron Dual-Core T1500

    The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium G2010

    The Pentium G2010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,641 points. Launch price was $466.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Pentium G2010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G2010 — a 39.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G2010. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G2010 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 scores 1,625 against the Pentium G2010's 1,641 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G2010.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1500Pentium G2010
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.87 GHz
    2.8 GHz+50%
    Base Clock
    2.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    3072 kB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    65 nm
    22 nm-66%
    Architecture
    Merom (2006−2008)
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    PassMark
    1,625
    1,641
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) / not specified (Pentium G2010). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1500Pentium G2010
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    No
    Target Use
    Budget