Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Core i3-560

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-560

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2010

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Core i3-560 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Core i3-560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Core i3-560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,625 vs 1,642).
    • ❌601.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 73W.

    Core i3-560

    2010

    Why buy it

    • βœ…+1% higher PassMark.
    • βœ…Draws 73W instead of 512W, a 439W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Celeron Dual-Core T1500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-560 better than Celeron Dual-Core T1500?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-560 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-560 is the better buy right now. Core i3-560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Core i3-560 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron Dual-Core T1500

    The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006βˆ’2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core i3-560

    The Core i3-560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010βˆ’2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,642 points. Launch price was $190.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-560's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 versus 0.33 GHz on the Core i3-560 β€” a 140% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses the Merom (2006βˆ’2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-560 uses Clarkdale (2010βˆ’2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 scores 1,625 against the Core i3-560's 1,642 β€” a 1% lead for the Core i3-560.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1500Core i3-560
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    1.87 GHz+467%
    0.33 GHz
    Base Clock
    β€”
    3.33 GHz
    L3 Cache
    β€”
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    65 nm
    32 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Merom (2006βˆ’2008)
    Clarkdale (2010βˆ’2011)
    PassMark
    1,625
    1,642+1%
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) / not specified (Core i3-560). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1500Core i3-560
    Integrated GPU
    No
    β€”
    Unlocked
    No
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    No
    β€”
    Target Use
    Budget
    β€”