Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs Celeron 2970M
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Celeron 2970M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is positioned at rank 444 and the Celeron 2970M is on rank 591, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2970M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Celeron 2970M
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,503 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 2970M
The Celeron 2970M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
Both the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Celeron 2970M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 2970M — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 2970M. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron 2970M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 scores 1,503 against the Celeron 2970M's 1,501 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 2970M.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 22 nm-66% |
| Architecture | Puma (2008−2009) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,503 | 1,501 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2970M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g2 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80) / VT-x (Celeron 2970M). The Celeron 2970M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2970M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2970M rivals Pentium 2020M.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Haswell) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Celeron 2970M
