Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs Xeon X5270
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Xeon X5270
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is positioned at rank 444 and the Xeon X5270 is on rank 928, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5270
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Xeon X5270 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Xeon X5270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon X5270
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,503 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon X5270
The Xeon X5270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,524 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is built on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 scores 1,503 against the Xeon X5270's 1,524 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon X5270. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5270.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Xeon X5270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Puma (2008−2009) | — |
| PassMark | 1,503 | 1,524+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5270 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 | Xeon X5270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g2 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon X5270
