Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
VS
Core i3-380UM

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs Core i3-380UM

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-380UM

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is positioned at rank 444 and the Core i3-380UM is on rank 225, so the Core i3-380UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

#432
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
586%
#433
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
577%
#434
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
530%
#435
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
527%
#436
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
523%
#438
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
505%
#439
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
484%
#440
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
483%
#441
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
470%
#444
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380UM

#213
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#214
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#215
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
353%
#216
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#217
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#219
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#220
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#221
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
322%
#222
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#225
Core i3-380UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-380UM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightTurion X2 Ultra ZM-80Core i3-380UM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion X2 Ultra ZM-80Core i3-380UM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core i3-380UM

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,503 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-380UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM — a 194.4% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-380UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 scores 1,503 against the Core i3-380UM's 1,502 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-80Core i3-380UM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz+6900%
0.03 GHz
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Puma (2008−2009)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,503
1,502
Geekbench 6 Single
199
Geekbench 6 Multi
451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-380UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-80Core i3-380UM
Socket
S1g2
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80) / No (Core i3-380UM). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-80Core i3-380UM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget