UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

2023Core: 450 MHzBoost: 750 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N).

InsightUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Longevity
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) scores 1,200 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is built on Gen. 12 while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Intel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score
1,200
1,231+3%
Architecture
Gen. 12
Generation 9.5
Process Node
10 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
24
184+667%
Boost Clock
750 MHz
1150 MHz+53%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Intel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) draws 15W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Intel UHD Graphics 630
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
80.0
82.1+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers NaN% better value. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Alder Lake Xe
Comet Lake GT2
Release
January 3 2023
October 1 2017
Ranking
#914
#824