
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs NVS 810

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Popular choices:

NVS 810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 810 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and NVS 810

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) scores 1,200 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is built on Gen. 12 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 512 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,192 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 24 | 512 ×2+2033% |
| Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 1033 MHz+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) draws 15W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 127.7% difference. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-78% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.0+357% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the NVS 810 launched at $700 and now averages $80. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) costs 100+% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 14.9 (NVS 810) — the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $700 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 14.9 |
| Codename | Alder Lake Xe | GM107 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #914 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















