UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs FirePro V8700
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Popular choices:
FirePro V8700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro V8700 is significantly newer (2011 vs 0). The FirePro V8700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V8700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V8700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) and FirePro V8700
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) scores 1,500 and the FirePro V8700 reaches 1,539 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) vs 1,280 (FirePro V8700).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,539+3% |
| Shading Units | 32 | 1280+3900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V8700 has 4 GB. The FirePro V8700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) draws 15W versus the FirePro V8700's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) vs 350W (FirePro V8700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+871% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V8700 launched at $1499 and now averages $170. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) costs 100+% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) vs 9.1 (FirePro V8700) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.1 |
| Codename | — | Cayman |
| Release | sem dados | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #776 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) and FirePro V8700
