UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Popular choices:
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is significantly newer (2014 vs 0). The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) scores 1,500 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,538+3% |
| Shading Units | 32 | 384+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) draws 15W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 102.5+3% |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | — | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | sem dados | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #776 | #763 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
