
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce GT 750M

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 750M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).
| Insight | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and GeForce GT 750M

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.

GeForce GT 750M
The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) scores 1,300 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 967 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,300 | 1,332+2% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 384+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz+14% | 967 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL11) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+226% | 26.6 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) vs 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) — the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 26.6 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GK107 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #820 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















